Significant Victories
EEOC v. W & O, Inc., 213 F.3d 600 (11th Cir. 2000)
Affirming awards of punitive damages to class of women under the Pregnancy Discrimination Act against employer who had a written policy barring pregnant waitresses from waiting tables past their fifth month of pregnancy; concluding that there was sufficient evidence for jury to find that employer acted with reckless indifference to the civil rights of its pregnant employees; as a matter of first impression, holding that each aggrieved employee may receive up to the full amount permitted by the applicable statutory cap on damages.
EEOC v. Stowe-Pharr Mills, Inc., 216 F.3d 373 (4th Cir. 2000)
Reversing summary judgment for employer in suit brought under the Americans with Disabilities Act; in spite of plaintiff’s statement in Social Security Disability Insurance application about her inability to work, the Commission was not estopped from asserting that plaintiff was a qualified individual with a disability, i.e. that she could perform the job’s essential functions with or without a reasonable accommodation.
Perseus, Inc. v. Canody, 995 S.W.2d 202 (Tex. App.—San Antonio, 1999, no pet.)
Affirming judgment in favor of plaintiff in dram shop case tried to a verdict.
Valdes v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 158 F.3d 584, 1998 WL 648571 (5th Cir. 1998) (not designated for publication)
Reversing and remanding for lack of subject matter jurisdiction on ground that non-diverse store manager owed independent duty to premises plaintiff.
Isbell v. Ryan, 983 S.W.2d 335 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1998, no pet.)
Reversing summary judgment granted on negligent supervision cause of action.

